CBL2025: April 27 – AMS Region Highlights

CBL2025 – April 27 | AMS Group Stage Match 1: WARR vs ZOD
Game 1 – City Siege: ZOD Attacks, WARR Defends
WARR made a critical error early—pushing their frontline forward while ZOD's Siphonarioi and Lionroar Crew were still active. Without proper shielding, their tank units were shredded in moments. What followed was a collapse.
ZOD seized the opportunity, sweeping into Point A. In the Base Camp showdown, WARR’s Siphonarioi misfired—key skills were wasted before direct contact, leaving them vulnerable. ZOD’s Cavalry struck from behind, breaking WARR’s formation and causing troops losses to spike over 400. ZOD capitalized on the chaos and claimed the first victory.
Game 2 – Sides Swapped: WARR Attacks, ZOD Defends
This time, WARR went for a bold flank. Skipping the main gate, they maneuvered around the right of Point A and captured high ground. At the same time, another squad took the left Supply Point, cutting ZOD’s reinforcements.
Though WARR suffered a troop deficit, the pressure forced ZOD to fall back to Base. Surprisingly, ZOD did not defend the Base entrance—instead stacking troops at the upper tier. WARR took advantage of the opening, pushing through the right lane and deploying formations at the Base gate.
With overlapping Trebuchet coverage and coordinated Unit pressure, WARR pulled off a comeback win to even the series.
Game 3 – Field Battle: Decider
WARR secured the first two points and went aggressive on ZOD’s force at Point B. But ZOD remained composed. They faked pressure at Point A, baiting WARR’s rotation, then swung back to recapture B.
As B fell, ZOD unlocked Base capture rights and sent a stealth Dual-Blade Hero deep behind enemy lines—solo-capping the Base Point while WARR’s forces were still repositioning. The play sealed the game.
ZOD wins the series 2-1 with a brilliant strategic finish!
 
CBL2025 – April 27 | AMS Group Stage Match 2: WM vs RAT
Game 1 – City Siege: WM Attacks, RAT Defends
WM opened with a two-lane assault, pushing Siege Towers through the left and center. But RAT had their artillery crew dialed in, unleashing punishing volleys at the narrow approach routes, stalling WM before they could scale the walls.
Shifting plans, WM attempted a frontal push through the main gate—but split their forces too thin. RAT struck hard, slicing through the divided offense and isolating troops one by one. The gap in troop count widened, and WM was never able to recover.
Despite all efforts, they couldn’t break RAT’s defensive formation. RAT held strong and claimed Game 1.
Game 2 – Sides Swapped: RAT Attacks, WM Defends
RAT focused their attack around the left Supply Point, aiming to collapse Point B. WM tried to set up a pincer response—but their flanking routes backfired. While circling through the central road, WM got caught mid-rotation by RAT’s forward surge.
The result: another split-force breakdown. RAT exploited the window perfectly, charging straight for the Base. While WM tried to reroute through the right lane, RAT's positioning advantage left no room for recovery.
RAT secured the Base Camp and closed the series 2-0.